-
“Strongly Regulate,” Social Media Edition
So earlier this week the President of the United States took to Twitter to baselessly accuse a private citizen of murder (as one does, amidst a pandemic that has claimed 100,000 American lives and…
-
“Nice Little Internet You’ve Got There – Be a Shame if Anything Happened to It.”
There’s another shift that comes amid the whining about “tech censorship” and the “silencing of conservative voices online,” and it’s a purely transactional one: put up our content or lose the immunity that CDA…
-
Why Content Moderation Codes Are More Guidelines Than Rules
Also, following on my last post: since the First Amendment protects site moderation & curation decisions, why all the calls to get rid of CDA 230’s content moderation immunity? Having listened carefully and at…
-
Let’s Talk About “Neutrality” – and How Math Works
So if the First Amendment protects site moderation & curation decisions, why are we even talking about “neutrality?” It’s because some of the bigger tech companies — I’m looking at you, Google and Facebook…
-
No, CDA 230(c)(2) Isn’t The Only Thing Keeping Conservatives Off YouTube
Over the last year or so, there’s been a surge of claims that Google, Twitter, YouTube, etc. are “biased against conservatives.” The starting point of this bad faith argument is a presumption that sites…
-
Further Thoughts on Professional Speech Regulation
OK, so in my post on the Visaline case, I explored the bizarre idea that regulators can keep people from speaking on certain topics, just by requiring a license to talk about those things…
